Wednesday, 6 October 2010
Why everything on mobility should go to Apple?
The question is, why it always Apple become the first runner for the mobility championship? Eventhough we have windows mobile, Symbian v3, and android, but they seem to be lacking behind in term of technology update. In addition, If we monitor the trend closely, everybody is following Apple. In term of application, usability, interface, or even physical design, every single eyes of manufacturer are seems looking direct to the Apple product.
The nearest probability I might be thinking is on the commercialization issue. The rest of manufacturers are still in hesitance to move beyond each other due to being scared for being rejected by users. Hence, they just do wait and see. Apple becomes the first runner to penetrate the market with their new gadget, and other will do the same with some modification and enhancement. Nonetheless, the Apple has become the glorious benchmark for all mobile manufacturers.
Well, I have tried Symbian, android, Iphone OS, for their user friendliness, rich of applications, supports, and community support. I found most of them tried to follow the concept brought by Apple Iphone. I am not surprise if just within a month there will be a mobile phone with the capability to handle HD (720p) video or even full HD (1080p), which higher than iphone has offered in Iphone 4, since Apple has successfully market their new technology with full of acceptance from the users.
Why everything on mobility should go to Apple?
The question is, why it always Apple become the first runner for the mobility championship? Eventhough we have windows mobile, Symbian v3, and android, but they seem to be lacking behind in term of technology update. In addition, If we monitor the trend closely, everybody is following Apple. In term of application, usability, interface, or even physical design, every single eyes of manufacturer are seems looking direct to the Apple product.
The nearest probability I might be thinking is on the commercialization issue. The rest of manufacturers are still in hesitance to move beyond each other due to being scared for being rejected by users. Hence, they just do wait and see. Apple becomes the first runner to penetrate the market with their new gadget, and other will do the same with some modification and enhancement. Nonetheless, the Apple has become the glorious benchmark for all mobile manufacturers.
Well, I have tried Symbian, android, Iphone OS, for their user friendliness, rich of applications, supports, and community support. I found most of them tried to follow the concept brought by Apple Iphone. I am not surprise if just within a month there will be a mobile phone with the capability to handle HD (720p) video or even full HD (1080p), which higher than iphone has offered in Iphone 4, since Apple has successfully market their new technology with full of acceptance from the users.
Why everything on mobility should go to Apple?
The question is, why it always Apple become the first runner for the mobility championship? Eventhough we have windows mobile, Symbian v3, and android, but they seem to be lacking behind in term of technology update. In addition, If we monitor the trend closely, everybody is following Apple. In term of application, usability, interface, or even physical design, every single eyes of manufacturer are seems looking direct to the Apple product.
The nearest probability I might be thinking is on the commercialization issue. The rest of manufacturers are still in hesitance to move beyond each other due to being scared for being rejected by users. Hence, they just do wait and see. Apple becomes the first runner to penetrate the market with their new gadget, and other will do the same with some modification and enhancement. Nonetheless, the Apple has become the glorious benchmark for all mobile manufacturers.
Well, I have tried Symbian, android, Iphone OS, for their user friendliness, rich of applications, supports, and community support. I found most of them tried to follow the concept brought by Apple Iphone. I am not surprise if just within a month there will be a mobile phone with the capability to handle HD (720p) video or even full HD (1080p), which higher than iphone has offered in Iphone 4, since Apple has successfully market their new technology with full of acceptance from the users.
Monday, 20 September 2010
Nokia strikes back
Nokia strikes back
Nokia strikes back
Thursday, 14 January 2010
Google`s mobile browser ready to smoke Iphone
Google`s mobile browser ready to smoke Iphone
Google`s mobile browser ready to smoke Iphone
Monday, 7 December 2009
Nokia and Symbian will never get devorce
Nokia and Symbian will never get devorce
Nokia and Symbian will never get devorce
Monday, 31 August 2009
Nokia N900 vs iPhone 3Gs
Nokia recently launched a new class of smartphone as its flagship. The promised N900 is a crossover between smartphones and Nokia’s Internet tablets, and makes its biggest break in its change of operating system: although still a phone, the handset runs Nokia’s latest Linux variant platform, not Symbian. Symbian OS seems like incapable to support a heavy duty computer likes application on phone. Maemo 5 renders it one of the first smartphones to have true PC-like multitasking and not only lets it run “dozens” of app windows at once but gives it a simple, large dashboard for switching and closing apps.
In hardware, Nokia makes clear the N900’s role as an effective replacement for the N97 and the company’s answer to the iPhone 3GS. The QWERTY slider design has the same 600MHz ARM Cortex-A8 processor as the Apple smartphone and a faster graphics core that, again like Apple, supports OpenGL ES 2.0 graphics features. GPS and Wi-Fi are similarly onboard. However, the N900 brings much more app memory at up to 1GB (256MB actual RAM), full HSPA-based 3G at up to 10Mbps down and 2Mbps up, and a much sharper 800×480, 3.5-inch touchscreen. The 5-megapixel camera and 32GB of storage are also carried over from the N97, but a microSDHC slot lets users add at least another 16GB with today’s cards.
Nokia N900 vs iPhone 3Gs
Nokia recently launched a new class of smartphone as its flagship. The promised N900 is a crossover between smartphones and Nokia’s Internet tablets, and makes its biggest break in its change of operating system: although still a phone, the handset runs Nokia’s latest Linux variant platform, not Symbian. Symbian OS seems like incapable to support a heavy duty computer likes application on phone. Maemo 5 renders it one of the first smartphones to have true PC-like multitasking and not only lets it run “dozens” of app windows at once but gives it a simple, large dashboard for switching and closing apps.
In hardware, Nokia makes clear the N900’s role as an effective replacement for the N97 and the company’s answer to the iPhone 3GS. The QWERTY slider design has the same 600MHz ARM Cortex-A8 processor as the Apple smartphone and a faster graphics core that, again like Apple, supports OpenGL ES 2.0 graphics features. GPS and Wi-Fi are similarly onboard. However, the N900 brings much more app memory at up to 1GB (256MB actual RAM), full HSPA-based 3G at up to 10Mbps down and 2Mbps up, and a much sharper 800×480, 3.5-inch touchscreen. The 5-megapixel camera and 32GB of storage are also carried over from the N97, but a microSDHC slot lets users add at least another 16GB with today’s cards.
Nokia N900 vs iPhone 3Gs
Nokia recently launched a new class of smartphone as its flagship. The promised N900 is a crossover between smartphones and Nokia’s Internet tablets, and makes its biggest break in its change of operating system: although still a phone, the handset runs Nokia’s latest Linux variant platform, not Symbian. Symbian OS seems like incapable to support a heavy duty computer likes application on phone. Maemo 5 renders it one of the first smartphones to have true PC-like multitasking and not only lets it run “dozens” of app windows at once but gives it a simple, large dashboard for switching and closing apps.
In hardware, Nokia makes clear the N900’s role as an effective replacement for the N97 and the company’s answer to the iPhone 3GS. The QWERTY slider design has the same 600MHz ARM Cortex-A8 processor as the Apple smartphone and a faster graphics core that, again like Apple, supports OpenGL ES 2.0 graphics features. GPS and Wi-Fi are similarly onboard. However, the N900 brings much more app memory at up to 1GB (256MB actual RAM), full HSPA-based 3G at up to 10Mbps down and 2Mbps up, and a much sharper 800×480, 3.5-inch touchscreen. The 5-megapixel camera and 32GB of storage are also carried over from the N97, but a microSDHC slot lets users add at least another 16GB with today’s cards.